Saturday 27 December 2014

Presenting Answers in CA Exam

Hi Guys!!

This blog shares my views and experiences on how answers should be presented in examinations.It is very important to practice presentation. What follows is different types of questions and how they can be answered:

1)      Direct Theory questions
Direct theory questions are like Features of Audit of cooperative society, Benefits of Continuous auditing, Limitations of MIS, and Types of Bond in Excise etc.
In case of these questions to the point direct answer should be given. Attempt must be made to make sure the bold point of module (study material) matches with bold point of your answer. Language of explanation may be different.

2)      Short Note question
Though it may be covered in direct theory question but I have taken it separately since it is definitely asked last question in paper.
There is generally 4 mark for each short note. The best 4-8 points must be written that you know about the topic in such question. 


3)      Provisional Theory Questions
These questions are related to principles laid down in various provisions of law or SAs and are asked in Law related subjects such as Corporate Law, Auditing, DT and IDT. In case of such questions correctly write down the principles of section and provisions asked in question. Section numbers may be dealt with in manner provided in blog Learning Sections.


4)      Situational Theory Questions
Examples of this type are- You are appointed as VAT auditor of XYZ Ltd. How will you proceed? These questions though appear a case based but is actually a direct question asking VAT Audit Procedure. Care should be taken in identifying such questions. Once identified you can proceed as a direct theory question.

Another example of such question is- You are the auditor of company and have identified related party transactions not presented properly. How will you deal with same?
This question touches aspects of CARO, AS18 and SA 550. Now while attempting questions like this following approach should be used in writing answer:
a)      In first part of answer write about AS 18, Caro as well as SA550. - What is required under law?  (How much to write depend on marks of question)
b)      In second part write the scenario given in the question- What has been done in given situation?
c)       In third part write what you as an auditor will do?

5)      Case study based question
These questions are asked mainly in Indirect and Direct Taxation. One should thoroughly read case studies compiled by ICAI as relevant for exams for these questions.
The answer to such questions should also be in 3 parts:
a)      First part write down how the facts of question case are similar to the real case decided.
b)      Second part explain the judgment given in real case.
c)       In third part make conclusion for case asked in question.
Note again that writing principles narrated in judgment correctly is more important than writing the name of parties involved in real case. If you confidently remember the name do write but if you are doubtful don’t write the names. Better not writing than writing a wrong name.

6)      Practical Questions
In case of practical questions the answer should be divided into 2 parts. One will be main solution and other will be working notes. Main solution may proceed or it may succeed working notes but it must be compact form- All working notes should be together and not in between main solution.
Working notes are very important while giving a practical answer and sometimes carry up to 40-50% of marks of the question Never miss them.
Practical solution should as far as possible be always in excel format or tabular format. This saves time as well as makes it easier for examiner to evaluate.



Note:  One must solve at least 4-5 past exam question papers by hand in exam like situation and then the answers written should be compared to suggested answer provided by ICAI. Such comparison will help you find areas where you are lagging and need improvement.
       




Happy reading!!

Tuesday 23 December 2014

Learning Sections

Hi Guys!!

I have written this blog for queries such as whether one should learn sections and write them in exams. What follows are my personal views and experiences and it is possible some fellows might not agree with them.

The first question whether to learn sections. See guys I always used to learn sections. It was never a burden for me. Rather it was the key as I used to learn law sectionally (in sequence of sections). This is what I did with all sections once I had studied them. It was like a quick revision note.



(Note: This is only a sample. Make your own notes of sections to remember)



So what I did was first learn the section numbers and name of all the sections. This helped me create a broad vision of all provisions. This is in accordance with principles as I had earlier written in a blog “Cracking Theory Practically”. This way one can easily remember sections as well as provisions in subjects like Direct Taxation, Indirect Taxation and Corporate and Allied Laws.

The next query is whether writing section number in exam is important. Well if you confidently remember the section number do write but if you are not confident then don’t write.

Better not writing than writing a wrong section number. What is more important is writing the principles laid down or the provisions related to topic asked correctly.

Bye!!!


Monday 15 December 2014

“Virat Kohli is not a match winner” - Being Sarcastic


Note: CA students following my blog may use label CA Guide to find blogs related to CA Exam Preperation. The link is http://casanjaynawandhar.blogspot.in/search/label/CA%20Guide

It was Saturday morning. The long awaited weekend in winters. Still I woke up at 5. It was the 5th day of First Test between India and Australia and the match was hung evenly. India required 364 to win in a day on Adelaide pitch which was turning perpendicular from roughs.

2 wickets lost early and in came Captain Virat Kohli who made a splendid century and nearly took India home. Too close yet too far. Once he departed the team collapsed like cards (even cards take more time). India lost by 48 runs.

It was an amazing batting display by Kohli. It was like two different games being played-one when Virat was batting and other when anyone else was batting. It was sheer awesomeness. Today every one applauded Virat’s effort but what will happen in 10 years from now.

People will say Virat was a player who made piles of runs and broke all records but he was not a match winner. How can I say it with so much of confidence that people will say this?? The reason is simple this is what I saw people saying about Sachin Tendulkar. (Time to realise why Sachin was a great player even though winning rate of team was low at that time.)

The fact is Sachin Tendulkar was and Virat Kohli is a champion.



Sunday 14 December 2014

Revision Strategy

Hi Guys!!

I have written this blog to address some queries relating to exam days strategy. So this covers strategy that I followed at time of last 2 revisions and exam days.

Generally the ease or difficulty of study at this crunch time depends on how well course has been covered on earlier occasions. So show dedication from the beginning.

Take 8 days per subject for Second Last Revision (say Revision A) and 4 days per subject for last revision (say Revision B). So one requires 64 days and 32 days respectively for this. Finally after this there will be the revision on day before exam (say Revision C). So we need to complete the course at least 96 days before exams.

I used to study subjects sequentially say first 8 days Paper 1,next 8 days Paper 2 and so on to complete Revision A. For Revision B I started with Paper 2. So Paper 2 on first 4 days then paper 3, so on and studied Paper 1 on last 4 days.

Note that for first paper one can skip Revision C by planning Revision B on 4 days just before that paper. Eg.- If paper1 Financial Reporting is on 2 May, plan Revision B of FR from 28 April to 1 May.

Revision A coverage

Ø  Practical Subjects
·         All concepts
·         All type of questions- So if there are 5 question of one type do the trickiest one. At this time tick those questions which you feel like doing again.
·         6-7 question papers of past attempts in exam like conditions in end

Ø  Theory Subjects
·         All concepts
·         See all past exam questions and tick those which have new concepts
·         6-7 question papers of past attempts in exam like conditions in end

Revision B coverage

Ø  Practical Subjects
·         All concepts
·         Questions ticked at time of Revision A
·         RTP
Ø  Theory subjects
·         All concepts
·         Ticked portions of past questions
·         RTP

Revision C coverage
·         Read All concepts- Don’t be selective even here but read quickly
·         Questions that are ticked
·         Ticked portions of RTP and Past Exam questions



Note that one has to study all concepts at time of all revisions. It is only that the amount of time spent on concepts that is reduced.

The day before exam there is time just to read and not learn. So it is important that you have already learned at time of Revision A and Revision B.

Note that if you are comfortable with other methods keep following. Like some students are more comfortable studying 2-3 subjects daily rather than one. Make changes in plan accordingly.

Further if you have more or less days, you can plan days for Revision A and Revision B in ratio of 2:1 accordingly.


Happy Reading!!

Sanjay Nawandhar

Tuesday 2 December 2014

CA vs MBA


Is this debate doing good to anyone?



A lot of eyebrows have already raised and a lot of people have already become excited to debate on this topic. To all those I am sorry. Here I am not debating for or against anyone rather I am writing against the generalization of this debate altogether.

I am in favor of taking away this topic from all the debate lovers. Last few days I got a chance to meet many budding CAs and MBAs. All of them had listened a lot of different views on this topic. And these views had completely influenced their mindset about both the courses.

There are views that CAs are better and there are views that MBAs are better and there is an expert opinion that CAs are good at one thing and MBAs at other (Lets leave those things alone for now).

Let us not generalize all this and see from the point of view of an individual student. Irrespective of whether one is a CA student or an MBA student; the objective remains to gain the knowledge in his field of interest, learn and improve his presentation and communication skills, take practical experience and get the confidence to achieve his career goals.

So what I feel is once a decision is taken to pursue either of the course, a budding CA or an aspiring MBA should not give a piece of his mind to this debate. Rather he should concentrate on analyzing where he stands, improving his own skills and progress in his own career.

Proud CA who respects MBA

Sanjay Nawandhar